My Written Testimony on the Epstein Network: Submitted, Not Heard

My Written Testimony on the Epstein Network: Submitted, Not Heard

And the Evidence to Back It

On May 12, 2026, the House Oversight Committee Democrats held a field hearing on the Epstein network in Palm Beach, Florida — the county where my own account began. My first interaction with Ghislaine Maxwell was in 1992, when I was 14 years old — I remember it specifically because I'd just had my braces removed. I was not called to testify.

I want to be precise about what happened, because the distinction matters. I did not decline to testify, and I was not offered a seat and unable to take it. I submitted a complete, sworn written record in advance — an oral statement, a sworn declaration under penalty of perjury, a full hearing packet, and dozens of supporting exhibits — and I was not called to speak at the hearing itself.

This is not the first time. I gave a recorded staff briefing to House Oversight Committee Democrats, including staff for Congresswoman Summer Lee, in September 2025. When the DOJ announced this past January that it did not intend to release any further files, I released that recording myself rather than let it sit unheard. I have cooperated with the FBI and NYPD since 2020. My account is documented, cross-referenced across multiple independently filed federal records, and has never changed in its substance. None of that made the difference between being written into the record and being heard in the room.

To my knowledge, I am also the only survivor witness in this network's documentation who has described being told a formal contract, signed with a specific individual, would be required before any "arrangement" could proceed — the same kind of contractual "girlfriend experience" language independently documented as established commercial terminology in this network years before I encountered it. That detail is in my declaration and in the supplementary exhibits below.

I'm not the first witness this has happened to, and I doubt I'll be the last. I wrote once before about what it means to be excluded — not from process, exactly, since the process technically included me, but from the room where the questions actually get asked out loud. Submitting a sworn statement that sits in a file is not the same as an oversight committee asking you, in front of cameras, what you saw. I did the first. I was not given the second.

So this post is the workaround. If the hearing room wasn't open to me, the record is still here, in full, for anyone willing to read it — media, oversight staff, other survivors, or anyone doing the work of following up that a five-minute hearing slot was never going to allow anyway.

What's in the full record

My Oral Statement — what I would have said, had I been called.

My Sworn Witness Declaration — my full account, under penalty of perjury, including corroborating detail not covered in my earlier staff briefing.

The Hearing Packet — a consolidated summary of my testimony, the federal records that independently corroborate it, and a timeline of my cooperation with law enforcement since 2020.

The Supplementary Exhibit Addendum — screenshots, FBI records, and documentary evidence organized by source, including my original FBI intake record (EFTA00020508), correspondence with NYPD, and additional corroborating DOJ file references.

Supporting Addendums:

• Addendum: The Cipro Cabinet — timeline corroboration

• Addendum 2: Columbia University — institutional context

• Addendum 4: Columbia Hospital — assault, corroboration, and law enforcement obstruction

• Exhibit F: Prior Recurrences — documented pattern predating the 2001 encounter

If you are a journalist, congressional staff, or law enforcement and need anything in this record clarified or expanded, you can reach me directly.